Happy to respond

Letters to the Editor - 9/26/13 edition

September 26, 2013 

Dear Editor,

I am happy to respond to Ms. White's and Ms. Hogan's request for substantiation of my assertion in the Sept. 3 Sierra Star that characterized sponsorship by 'Women in Business' of Congressman Tom McClintock's recent Oakhurst appearance as having placed 'politics above gender.'

As the father of four women and grandfather of four more, I feel it important to herein include without edit the rest of that observation as stated in my column: '... placing politics above gender in their support of McClintock, who refused to vote for the 'Equal Pay for Women Act' and the 'Violence Against Women Act,' while being completely supportive of the anti-gay 'Defense of Marriage Act.'

As far as Ms. White's and Ms. Hogan's obvious attempt at now scurrying away to distance themselves from McClintock's politics — for which he is not asked to apologize — and their expressed chagrin as to why 'Women in Business' were 'singled out.' The full-color flyer I received urging attendance issued by the Oakhurst Chamber of Commerce on Aug. 21 had 'Women in Business' listed in large font and no other organization, beyond the chamber, was similarly featured. Referencing the verb 'co-sponsored,' I offer the following definition of 'sponsor' from the Cambridge American-English Dictionary: 'Sponsor – To support a person, organization, or activity by giving money, encouragement, or other help.'

Peter Cavanaugh, Oakhurst

The Sierra Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service